Showing posts with label dan savage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label dan savage. Show all posts

Monday, October 17, 2011

Indy Car

Indy Car: An unknown young driver then, Ganassi was trying to decide whether to spend $85,000 for a new Eagle chassis from Dan Gurney or $70,000 for a used Penske car. He purchased neither but still gained a valuable lesson in a phone call with a man who already was an auto racing magnate.

"Roger said, 'Whether you buy a used Penske or a new Gurney, the hotel rooms cost exactly the same,'" Ganassi said. "It sounds like a 'no,' but it's a really powerful statement. Compared to so many fixed expenses, the variable costs of the car are minuscule. It was some of the best business advice I've ever gotten."

Thirty years later, that conversation could be looked at as the template for how the twin powerhouses have dominated and guided the Izod IndyCar Series.

Sunday's World Championships at Las Vegas Motor Speedway will mark the fourth consecutive season finale in which Target Chip Ganassi Racing will battle Team Penske for the crown.

Since Ganassi scored its first win in 1994, the teams have been in a statistical dead heat in several categories. Ganassi has 85 victories, 431 top-10 finishes and eight titles. During the same span, Penske has notched 80 wins, 421 top-10s and four championships.

But while their relationship might be defined by their rivalry, it's also grounded in a stewardship of the sport that is symbiotic. As their teams have battled fiercely on the track, Ganassi and Penske have banded together off it to form a united front on the major issues facing IndyCar.

"We've tried to lead," Penske said. "He and I have stayed consistent on what we think is best for the series.

"Like Jerry Jones in the NFL and others in these big sports, owners have to lead because we're making the investment. Sometimes there's short-term thinking in the sanctioning bodies because they're not spending the money. If we're going to be good, we need to have the continuity of our sponsors, and that's where Chip and I are connected at the hip. We need to keep the Targets, Verizons and Shells in the sport."

Among the causes that have connected them:

When the Indy Racing League absorbed Champ Car more than three years ago, Ganassi and Penske were among the key players in the backroom discussions that led to peace between the warring series.

IndyCar CEO Randy Bernard has credited Ganassi and Penske with this year's adoption of double-file restarts after both watched how it energized NASCAR. Ganassi thought the change would help casual fans familiar with NASCAR relate to IndyCar, and Penske thought it would enhance competition.

"I said to Randy, 'If I wreck a couple of cars, that's my guys' fault,'" Penske said. "We're making it tougher on ourselves, but Chip and I were right together and typically thinking of the big picture. That's a good example of giving back to the series."

The two pushed for a switch to carbon brakes, which meant higher short-term costs but more durability, and they have endorsed the series' push to restrict testing.

Ganassi said he speaks with Penske at least a few times a month. As in their first telephone call, the topic is often cost containment.

"A lot of our competitors don't see it that way," Ganassi said. "When the bigger teams make suggestions, the smaller teams always think they're looking for an advantage. But it's really to save all of us money. It's hard to get across that paying more for an expensive part now can save money later. It's on those things that the bigger teams show leadership, and Roger and I have done that for the betterment of the sport."

Sometimes they help each other.

It still is somewhat of an odd coupling. Aside from a passion for winning, they share few similarities.

Penske, 74, has become synonymous with Detroit while building a multibillion-dollar empire around the auto industry, and his teams (replete with black slacks and starched shirts) reflect his buttoned-up business acumen.

Ganassi, 53, is a life-long Pittsburgh man who operates his businesses with more of a blue-collar savvy and a sometimes-gruff exterior.

The geographic divide of their teams (Ganassi is based in Indianapolis, Penske in Mooresville, N.C.) has precluded much personnel crossover, and the owners cut each other little slack despite their shared vision for the sport.

"The main thing is we respect each other," Penske said. "When the race starts, he watches every move we make. If we step out of line, he's letting (IndyCar officials) know, and vice versa."

Said Ganassi: "Our teams do a lot of keeping each other honest. Roger would be the first to call it in if we run over a hose in the pit lane. But, conversely, he's also the first to congratulate you. Getting an attaboy or pat on the back from him is a pretty good feeling."

There have been more of those congratulations recently as Ganassi has won the last three championships (two with Franchitti, one with Scott Dixon).

Penske still might be more renowned by virtue of having won a record 15 Indianapolis 500s (vs. Ganassi's three).

"I like when Penske is called the best, because it makes it that much sweeter when we beat him," Ganassi said with a chuckle. "I'm happy to give him that title, but we'll take the wins.

"Through his guidance and setting the bar high for so many years, he's made it possible for people like me to make a living at the sport. I hope I'm still enjoying it as much as he does in 20 years."

Dan Wheldon

Dan Wheldon: So far, things haven't been going very well as we've started our pursuit of the GoDaddy IndyCar Challenge this weekend at Las Vegas Motor Speedway, but I'm confident in the ability of the guys at Sam Schmidt Motorsports to find the problem and get it fixed.

It's actually been a very difficult weekend for us so far. Basically we carried over our problem from Kentucky Speedway, where we just didn't have the speed and never really found it.

But I've been watching these guys work their tails off trying to fix this problem, and I believe they'll turn it around before Sunday's race. As you know, the Challenge is a rather unique promotion.

I'll start 34th in a 34-car field in Sunday's Izod IndyCar World Championships presented by Honda. If I win the race, I'll split a $5 million prize with Ann Babenco of High Bridge, N.J., who was chosen at random.

DIARY 1: Wheldon fired up for shot at $5 millionBut during Thursday's practice session and Friday's practice and qualifying sessions, we were quite a bit off the pace in the No. 77 Bowers & Wilkins Magnolia/William Rast Dallara/Honda. When I say quite a bit, I mean more than 3 mph off the pace.

If we start the race that far off the pace, it's going to be difficult to keep up.

But I have every confidence in Rob Edwards, our team manager, and his group of engineers. Rob has done a very good job of analyzing the problem. He's eliminating issues one by one. Hopefully by the race, we will have changed things enough that we will have discovered what's slowing us down.

It is incredibly frustrating, both for me and them. All the boys are working as hard as possible, but so far we haven't pinpointed what it is.

Part of the reason it's so frustrating is because we'd created so much momentum around Indy, both with my victory in Bryan Herta's car and with Alex Tagliani's pole position in the car we're driving this weekend.

But there are a couple of positives. First, this is essentially the same group of people that combined to win the pole and the race at Indy; we've just switched cars. Alex is in the No. 98 car that I drove at Indy, and I'm in the No. 77 he drove to the pole at Indy.

Second, and this is key, Alex has been fast in the 98 car so far at Vegas. Very fast. He's got the fourth starting position for Sunday's race, so we know we have the potential for a good car. We just haven't found it yet.

So everybody in our garage is trying their best, and they're going about it methodically and professionally, step by step, trying to get to the bottom of it. It's obviously something significant, because I'm so far off the pace. Alex did a 221.330 mph for his two-lap qualifying run. I barely got over 218. So whatever the problem is, it's significant.

That, too, gives me confidence. A difference that large forces you to look at everything. You're that far off, so you need to change everything. You have to be bold in your changes, and that's what Rob is being. When the difference in speed is small, the problem is harder to find. But we're not a little bit off, so it should be easier to define the problem.

I'm impressed by Rob and his guys and how detailed they're being and how hard they're trying, but it's frustrating for everyone. These guys want to win this challenge just as much as I do, so they're giving it everything they have.

Another good thing is that we have a full day Saturday to work on the problem. Right now, all they need is time to take the car apart and check everything. I'm confident they'll find it and we'll get out there Sunday with a car that can move through the field.

This is going to be an amazing show. The two championship contenders, Dario Franchitti and Will Power, are starting right next to each other in the middle of the grid.

Honestly, if I can be fast enough early in the race to be able to get up there and latch onto those two, it will be pure entertainment. It's going to be a pack race, and you never know how that's going to turn out.

We all know what this team can do, and I know what I can do. At the end of the day, I have every confidence I them. We should be good in the race. They've worked hard at this, and they'll figure it out.

As long as I can find some speed and keep up with the pack, I'll do everything I can to put on a show.

Thursday, September 22, 2011

Rick Santorum

Rick Santorum:  Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has decided to do something about his Google problem, reportedly calling on the company to eliminate dirty search results connected to his name.

Just type his name into the search browser and you'll see why. Instead of campaign websites and Wikipedia pages, the top two results for "Santorum" link to foul, sex-related definitions of the former Pennsylvania senator's name that were circulated by gay rights activist and prankster columnist Dan Savage.

In response to comments the former Senator made in 2003 equating homosexuality with polygamy and incest, Savage launched an online competition to redefine the word "Santorum."

The winning result is not child-approved, to say the least, and Santorum, 53, is fed up with the "filth," as he calls it. The White House hopeful has reportedly called on Google to filter the unflattering search results, which have topped the list for more than six years.

"I suspect if something was up there like that about Joe Biden, they'd get rid of it," he told Politico. "If you're a responsible business, you don't let things like that happen in your business that have an impact on the country."

The White House hopeful added that "to have a business allow that type of filth to be purveyed through their website or through their system is something that they say they can't handle but I suspect that's not true."

The campaign has yet to return a request for comment.

Google's response: Don't blame the messenger, blame the webmaster.

"Google's search results are a reflection of the content and information that is available on the Web," company spokesman Gabriel Stricker said in a statement. "Users who want content removed from the Internet should contact the webmaster of the page directly.

"Once the webmaster takes the page down from the Web, it will be removed from Google's search results through our usual crawling process."

Stricker added that Google does "not remove content from our search results, except in very limited cases such as illegal content and violations of our webmaster guidelines."

While Santorum has criticized both Savage and Google multiple times for the search results, he also used the issue to raise campaign donations.

"Savage and his perverted sense of humor is the reason why my children cannot Google their father's name," Santorum wrote in a July letter to campaign supporters, according to Politico. "That is why I need your support today, and your contribution of $25, $50, $100 or $250 to my campaign. You can help right now by making a small or large contribution to my campaign. Don't let Dan Savage and the extreme left win."

In the 2003 interview with the Associated Press, Santorum said homosexual acts "undermine the basic tenets of our society and the family."

"If the Supreme Court says that you have the right to consensual sex within your home," Santorum said in the interview, "then you have the right to bigamy, you have the right to polygamy, you have the right to incest, you have the right to adultery. You have the right to anything. Does that undermine the fabric of our society? I would argue yes, it does."